House Republicans in Close Races Worry Trump’s Problems May Hurt Them
Like many Republican candidates, Representative Barbara Comstock is trying to prevent Donald J. Trump’s problems from becoming hers.
Early
on, she supported Senator Marco Rubio’s presidential bid. In ensuing
months, she remained resolutely reticent on Mr. Trump, simply never
uttering his name in trying to avoid any political undertow that he
might create. But after the release last week of a recording in which Mr. Trump boasted in vulgar terms about assaulting women, Ms. Comstock was among the first Republicans to call on him to step down.
“This
is disgusting, vile and disqualifying,” she said in a statement. “No
woman should ever be subjected to this type of obscene behavior, and it
is unbecoming of anybody seeking high office.”
Ms.
Comstock is hoping her disavowal will be enough. The outcome here in
Loudoun County, which in recent years has been seen as a bellwether in
presidential politics, will provide a measure of any down-ballot damage
that Mr. Trump’s contentious candidacy may have caused.
Ms.
Comstock’s wealthy, highly educated district in the suburbs of
Washington is a diversity-rich hub of government largess, where federal
contractors commute past Buddhist temples, mosques and churches that
offer services in Korean.
“If
the Democrats have any prayer of taking the House, and I think it’s
just a long shot, they’ve got to win this seat,” said Thomas M. Davis
III, a former Republican congressman who represented portions of Ms.
Comstock’s district.
So far, many analysts say, there is scant evidence that voters will penalize candidates because of Mr. Trump.
“Believe
it or not, it hasn’t changed matters all that much,” said David
Wasserman, the House of Representatives editor for The Cook Political
Report. He has forecast that Democrats could pick up as many as 20
seats, 10 short of the number needed to regain control of the House.
Polls
have shown that voters are willing to separate their support for
certain House and Senate candidates from their feelings about the top of
the ticket. In an effort to bolster Ms. Comstock and other vulnerable
Republicans, the Congressional Leadership Fund, a “super PAC”
aligned with Republicans, announced Friday that it would invest an
additional $10 million into 15 targeted races, including hers.
Speaker Paul D. Ryan
of Wisconsin also has tried to ensure his party holds its House
majority, offering a policy agenda and promising appearances in dozens
of cities to lend his fund-raising power.
His campaign said on Thursday that Mr. Ryan had raised $15.4 million in the third quarter, collecting more than $48.2 million in 2016. He has transferred more than $31 million of that to the National Republican Congressional Campaign Committee.
Mr.
Ryan — having disinvited Mr. Trump from their first planned joint
appearance in Wisconsin last weekend after news of the recording broke —
effectively cut his members free on Monday, saying he would not defend nor campaign
with Mr. Trump. He has instead shifted his focus to the argument that
Republicans need to be re-elected to serve as a bulwark against a
potential President Hillary Clinton.
Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the Democratic leader, has proved once more
to be a fund-raising powerhouse, raising $34.6 million for House
Democrats in the third quarter and $127.7 million this election cycle,
the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee said on Wednesday.
Graphic: The Senate Is in Play. Is There a Trump Effect? |
Initial reactions to the 2005 recording of Mr. Trump have also given Democrats cause for optimism. A Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll,
conducted shortly after the recording was released by The Washington
Post, showed 49 percent of voters preferred Democrats take control of
Congress, compared with 42 percent who preferred Republicans — the
largest advantage for Democrats since the government shutdown in 2013.
But Democrats have a steep climb. With 247 seats, House Republicans hold their largest majority since 1931.
Nathan
L. Gonzales, the editor of the Rothenberg & Gonzales Political
Report, estimates that Republicans have already locked up 217 seats —
and they only need 218 to keep their majority.
But
Republican strategists are haunted by the prospect that voters who
would typically support Republicans might become so disillusioned that
they choose to stay home.
“This
is a highly polarized environment,” Mr. Wasserman said. “And I think
the only reason for Democrats to overperform on Election Day is that
Republicans are so depressed that they don’t show up.”
At this point, that does not look very likely, he said. While more
educated, conservative voters who may have been more likely to split
their ticket are looking less enthusiastic, Mr. Trump’s base remains
energized, he said.
In the suburbs of Minneapolis, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has run ads trying to tie Representative Erik Paulsen,
a Republican, to Mr. Trump. Mr. Trump is unpopular there, but the
contest had been trending in favor of Mr. Paulsen — who last week joined
Ms. Comstock in announcing he would not vote for him.
Similarly,
in northeastern Iowa, Democrats have been struggling to oust
Representative Rod Blum, a Republican who is a member of the hard-right
House Freedom Caucus. Mr. Blum’s district voted for Mr. Obama twice, but
the pickup, originally thought to be likely, has been bedeviling
Democrats. Mr. Blum has denounced Mr. Trump’s remarks but did not comment on whether he would continue to support him, according to The Des Moines Register.
Districts
that had been seeing a so-called Trump effect appear to be the ones
with higher concentrations of Latinos and Asians, Mr. Wasserman said.
Also, college-educated, white women — a group that may be especially
motivated by animus toward Mr. Trump — are also showing strikingly
strong support for Mrs. Clinton this year, said William H. Frey, a
demographer at the Brookings Institution.
Though Ms. Comstock’s district trends slightly Republican, voters twice supported Mr. Obama. Mr. Trump is not popular here.
Mr.
Davis, who represented the area for seven terms, said most voter
aversion to Mr. Trump stemmed from his propensity for insults.
“This
is a pretty dignified, educated group, and they’re just not into
insulting people and all that,” he said. “Not particularly liberal, but
dignified.”
Just
one day before disavowing Mr. Trump, during a debate hosted by the
local chamber of commerce here, Ms. Comstock cited a collaboration with
Senator Tim Kaine, a fellow Virginian and the Democratic
vice-presidential nominee. She twice invoked Bill Clinton, the president
whose administration she built a reputation investigating in the 1990s
as a House chief counsel. She steered clear of saying Mr. Trump’s name,
saying she was “still watching” the race to decide who would get her
vote.
LuAnn
Bennett, a real estate developer who is challenging Ms. Comstock, on
Wednesday slammed her for waiting so long to reject Mr. Trump.
“I’m afraid that what my opponent was clearly ‘watching’ for was how best to preserve her own political career,” she said.
No comments:
Post a Comment